I once told a friend of mine
that some Missourians
love fighting, feuding
and their dogs...
On the 28th of October, 1869
when the Irishman Charlie Burden stepped out side his home
to listen to his dogs
running hot trail in the distance
he knew that the whole pack
was out having fun.
He knew each dog by his excited bark
and he could hear his favorite coon dog
a black and tan hound named old Drum.
Then he heard a gunshot.
The shot came from the direction
of his neighbor's property,
Leonidas Hornsby.
Burden supposed that his neighbor
was hunting with his dogs
or that they had ran tree
and that Hornsby had killed the coon.
After the gunshot Burden could hear his hounds continue running trail...
all except old Drum.
He didn't hear old Drum after that.
Then Burden remembered
that Hornsby had, had troubles
with wild dogs getting in his sheep
and he had lost over a hundred this way.
Burden also remembered how in anger
Hornsby had said he would kill any stray dog that came onto his place...
Burden was a little concerned
since he had not heard Drum's bark
after the shot but there could be
a number of reasons for this...
The next morning when old Drum didn't show up Burden went over to see Hornsby.
"Lon, have you seen anything of my dog Drum
around here?"
"No."
"What dog was it that you shot last night?"
"That was Dick Ferguson, my ward.
He shot a load of shelled corn
at a black looking dog under a cedar tree."
The next day, Burden was out
looking for old Drum
and was being helped by another neighbor...
It was down in the Big Creek bottoms
that they found old Drum laying dead.
Burden was angry as hell
and he thought of going over
and shooting Hornsby for being so low
as to shoot and kill his dog.
But he didn't think he could get away with doing this...
So, unable to let it drop
Burden brought a lawsuit for damages against Hornsby.
In this first trial
the jury was unable
to come to an agreement
about Hornsby being responsible
for having the dog killed.
Now, still angry as hell
Burden pressed for another trial.
In this second trial, Burden won a verdict...
But Hornsby appealed to a higher court
and got the verdict overturned.
These three trials over a killed dog begin to gain in notoriety
and soon the whole community was taking sides
with some men walking stiff legged
saying what they would do if it was their dog.
There was rumor that there was a witness to the shooting of old
Drum but the man that was so named had disappeared.
After that an additional rumor spread
that he had been threatened with a horse whipping if he tried to testify.
Burden, being stubborn Irish
was determined to have justice
and so he hired the best attorneys
out of Sedalia, Missouri...
A man named George Graham Vest
of Philips and Vest, Attorneys at Law...
Hornsby responded by also getting a top notch set of attorneys
Thomas Crittenden of Crittenden and Cockrell, Attorneys at Law.
Tom Crittenden was a well known and respected attorney that later became Governor of the state of Missouri.
Upon his desk the famous outlaw
Frank James would lay his guns and surrendered, saying
that he had never surrendered his guns to any man and he had never removed them
for over twenty years.
By now "the dog trial" as it was called
was in all the newspapers,
was becoming the focus of much concern
in many states around Missouri.
Sides in the conflict were being taken
and emotions were getting high.
In Missouri you can kill a drunk
or a no-count routy
or even a nuisance
but folks here in Missouri don't like it one damn bit when you go killing a dog.
There is a principal involved.
Dogs are little innocent things, like children.
They don't know when they've done wrong...
You don't go killing children
and you don't go killing dogs for being dogs.
The now famous trial
known as "Burden v. Hornsby"
was set for the 23rd of September, 1870
in Johnson County, Missouri.
The old courthouse still stands
at 306 North Main
in Warrensburg, Missouri.
Back and forth the oratory and arguments flew from first one attorney then the other.
Finally, all arguments having been presented to the court it was time for closing statements.
George Vest in his closing argument to the jury waxed poetic and gave a closing that has gone down in history as
one of
the finest eulogies ever
given by man
for the loyal and faithful dog...
In his closing argument, George Vest
approached the jury and
in great eloquence said:
"Gentlemen of the Jury,
The best friend a man has in this world
may turn against him
and become his worst enemy.
His son or daughter
that he has reared with loving care
may prove ungrateful.
Those who are nearest and dearest to us
those whom we trust with our happiness
and our good name, may become traitors to their faith.
The money that a man has, he may lose.
It flies away from him, perhaps when he needs it the most.
A man's reputation may be sacrificed
in a moment of ill-considered action.
The people who are prone to fall on their knees
to do us honor when success is with us
may be the first to throw the stone of malice
when failure settles its cloud upon our heads.
The one absolutely unselfish friend
that a man can have in this selfish world
the one that never deserts him
and the one that never proves ungrateful
or treacherous
is his dog.
Gentlemen of the jury
a man's dog stands by him in prosperity
and in poverty
in health and in sickness.
He will sleep on the cold ground
where the wintry winds blow
and the snow drives fiercely
if only he may be near his master's side.
He will kiss the hand that has no food to offer he will lick the wounds and sores
that come in encounters with the roughness of the world.
He guards the sleep of his pauper master
as if he were a prince.
When all other friends desert
he remains.
When riches take wings and reputation falls to pieces he is as constant in his love
as the sun in its journey through the heavens.
If fortune drives the master forth an outcast in the world
friendless and homeless
the faithful dog asks no higher privilege
than that of accompanying him
to guard against danger
to fight against his enemies
and when the last scene of all comes
and death takes the master in its embrace
and his body is laid away in the cold ground
no matter if all other friends pursue their way there by his graveside will the noble dog be found his head between his paws
his eyes sad but open in alert watchfulness
faithful and true even to death..."
There was not a dry eye in the courtroom...
Grown men hung their head
their shoulders shaking as
they wept bitterly...
The courtroom was now so angry at Hornsby that Crittenden was reported to have leaned
over to his partner Cockrell and said:
"The dead dog has won...
And further more
we had better get our client out of
here
before we are all hung."
It took the jury just two minutes
to reach a verdict in favor of Burden
and awarded him the maximum of $50
for damages done to him and old Drum...
After three years of continuing litigation
The Missouri State Supreme Court
would uphold the decision
of the Court at Warrensburg
"Burden v. Hornsby" has been said to be
one of the most famous and perhaps
the most significant "murder" trials
ever held in the State of Missouri
George Vest's closing argument
has become a world-wide eulogy
for dog and master alike.
It closed the door on what had been needed
to have been said about man's best friend
for thousands of years.
Missourians everywhere listened and rose up in unanimous defense of their dog.
It is said that this was the origin
of the popularized use of
"Man's best friend"...
Today, there is a plaque on the wall
of that courthouse in Warrensburg
in honor of old Drum.
And on the southeast corner of the courtyard stands a statue of old Drum
a much loved black and tan...